The “under-polluted” part of the world

“I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that….. I’ve always thought that under-populated countries in Africa are vastly UNDER-polluted…”

Lawrence Summers

Humans are able to put an economic value to everything and it includes pollution. However, trading pollution like other commodities? International trade of pollution (toxic waste) to other countries, usually developing countries, is unethical and unacceptable. The wealthier corporations take advantage of these countries’ vulnerability. Then they use their land to dump toxic waste in exchange for their monetary needs.

Usually these countries are poor and in debt. Therefore, it is extremely tempting to take toxic waste in exchange of money. Plus, many developing countries have corrupted political leaders that can be easily bribed to accepting terms to waste disposal in their countries. These countries do not have strong environmental regulations for waste disposal, and expertise to identify citizens who are ill due to waste disposal.

Sadly, there are no international laws to protect these developing countries. Even current political power lies in the hands of the wealthier nations. Commerce Clause is being used at the global level and considers toxic waste as good or product, and hence allows trans-boundary transporting of waste.

Child with sores after exposed to toxic waste

It is upsetting to know that developed countries are dumping their waste to people who are vulnerable and unable to protect themselves. This will encourage large corporations to produce more waste than taking initiative for cleaner alternative. This issue should attract greater international attention and stronger pressure for an solution for this unethical trading.

Leave a Reply