How to incorporate nature into daily life

When I was writing the post on outdoor outings, I started to think, connecting with nature shouldn’t just be a weekend affair. We should try to make it a part of our lives as much as possible. That’s why I decided to do this post. This is just some preliminary ideas, if I think of more I”l do a part 2.

Here we go!

1) Walk to places that are 1-3 bus stops away, instead of getting on the bus. Just being outside enjoying the fresh air can do wonders (although best not to do this if you are late for something!).

2) If you have a balcony or live in a condo, take your lunch/dinner outside, maybe by the pool.

3) Try doing some sunbathing, the vitamin D will do you good.

4) When you are at NTU, try studying at one of the tables outside instead of cooped up in the library (if it’s not too hot!).

5) Go for a short walk between chionging/cramming sessions. It will refresh your mind so you can come back rejuvenated.

6) When you are walking outside, take off your headphones, look around, listen out for different sounds, see how many birds you can spot.

 

There you are, 6 is a pretty good start I think!

Can you think of other ways to get closer to nature?

 

 

Fun Fact: Singapore is a stopover point for thousands of migratory birds traveling the East Asian Flyway.  smiley

 

Posted in Reconnecting with nature | Leave a comment

Gap between environmental identity and behavior – Part 2

In a previous post I mentioned some factors other than EI that influence our behavior towards the environment. Since that one focused on external factors, I thought I’d make another on internal factors. Here we go!

1) Knowledge.

People should understand the threats we pose to the environment, as well as the implications of our choices. If we don’t, how will we know how to act? Intention may be there, but knowledge on how to act is needed to proceed.

2) Attitudes and values.

These are based on personal experience and may compliment an EI, or contradict it. Openness to change and concern for others are two examples of values that research has proven to correlate with pro-environmental behavior.

3) Self-Efficacy/Perceived behavioral control.

The belief that we can act pro-environmentally and that this has an actual impact on our environment can be an even stronger factor than knowledge or attitudes. We won’t act if we think that doing so will make no difference, or that we won’t be able to do it in the first place.

4) Competing identities.

Part of our identity can be tied to the environment. However, another part may encourage behavior that goes against the former. For example, we may see ourselves as caring for the environment, but we may also be tech buffs who enjoy the latest gadget and the biggest, best quality sounds systems. Our hobby can use up a lot of energy, and if we are constantly replacing our old gadgets with new ones, waste also becomes an issue.


tv

(via harveynorman.ie)

 heavy breathing

(via amazon.com)

 

These are just some internal factors I thought most relevant. Do you find that these influence how you behave towards the environment?

Until the next one!

 

 

“Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.” – Leo Tolstoy (writer, philosopher)  smiley

 

 

Posted in Environmental Identity | Leave a comment

Outdoor outings – ideas

As someone whose life often lacks the presence of nature, I am always trying to find fun activities to do outside. I like to plan outings for Sundays so I don’t just end up lying in bed hungover after a night out in Clarke Quay! Let me share some of the ways I connect with nature. Before that though, I also want to point out that even though nature-deficit disorder focuses on children, adults are also at risk. Therefore it’s just as important that we find ways for ourselves to connect with nature – regardless of whether we have children or not.

Onto the outing ideas –

1) If you are into running you surely know a lot of places to run by now. Still, I wanted to share a place I went to not long ago  – the green corridor. Now I am not a hardcore runner by any means, but I try to go every now and then to keep relatively active. I used to live near buona vista mrt and this place was right there, albeit hidden. It was very secluded and relaxing.

running corridor

(me and my friends going for a run there – all smiles)

Even if you are not into running, try going for a walk there! But make sure it’s daylight because there didn’t seem to be any lights when I was there (part of the reason I liked it). If you go with friends like I did it’s even more fun.

2) Picnics are a great way to relax, and from experience I think Singaporeans really love food! I recently had one at Botanic Gardens, it was very peaceful!

IMG-20130102-WA0000

(my friend getting stuck into that cake)

3) Cycling/rollerskating at East Coast park. So cheap as well (10 dollars for half an hour).

4) Canoeing at MacRitchie Reservoir.

DSC_0746

(post-canoeing posing)

5) Visiting Pulau Ubin. I’m quite sure most Singaporeans have already done this by now!

6) Take up a new sport/hobby that you can do outside. For example, a friend recently took up dragonboating and she’s hooked.

 

Those are some ideas to get you started, as I think of more I’ll post them up. Thanks for reading!

 

 

 

Fun Fact: The flying fox, the world’s largest bat with a wingspan of up to 1.5 metres, can be found on Pulau Ubin.  smiley

Posted in Reconnecting with nature | Leave a comment

What can nature offer us, that we can’t find elsewhere?

Looking through my blog posts I realized that within each of them lies an assumption – nature offers us something vital that we can’t get from other places/experiences. Whilst it seems intuitive that nature enriches, and is even essential to our psychological well-being, it’s good to lay things out clearly. It helps us reflect and truly acknowledge the role of nature in our lives.

Reading an interview with Louv (link below), something he pointed out really resonated with me. He credits nature for creating a ‘sense of wonder and awe.’ It’s not always necessary, in my opinion, to reduce experience to scientific measurements, and concepts like wonder and awe hold their own value. It’s no doubt that nature and living things are capable of stirring feelings of awe and delight, feelings that are very different from the enjoyment of going to the arcade or watching a movie. It’s a different kind of sensation and a unique one.

Louv also mentions how nature allows us a place of freedom and exploration. Without man-imposed rules we are able to create our own stories and maximize our creativity. It feeds children’s curiosity and let’s them take the lead. It simultaneously engages all our senses – we see, we smell, we hear, we touch. Well maybe we don’t taste! It evokes strong emotions and forms lasting impressions.

Furthermore, there is a calming effect that nature unequivocally has (incidentally interacting with nature can alleviate symptoms of ADHD). Perhaps it’s the feeling of being part of something bigger. Or maybe it’s the sensation that nature goes on without our interference, and does just fine – in fact it thrives. There is also what people call a spiritual element of nature – one which we can’t manufacture in a lab or create with a microchip.

Poets write about it, photographers capture it, philosophers dwell on it .

 

What do you think makes interacting with nature such a unique experience?

 

If you want to check out Louv’s interview yourself click here.

 

“Nature always wears the colors of the spirit”Ralph Waldo Emerson (poet)

smiley

 

Posted in Nature-deficit disorder | Leave a comment

What is Singapore doing?

As promised I did some research and found out about some ways in which Singapore seems to be responding to NDD. This of course is just a preview of noteworthy efforts, and not an exhaustive list. Links are available for more information.

1) Community in Bloom (National Parks Board). Young and old get together to create gardens and beautify their estates. It has been around for around 10 years.

2) The National Geographic Channel Young Explorer Programme. Kids aged 7-10 go on nature trails around Singapore learning about the plants and animals found there.

nation

(via enews.sg)

3) HEAL. A humane education programme for primary schools; it encourages children ‘to understand and appreciate how our planet’s diverse environments, people and animals are all connected, related and interdependent.’ It also focuses on empathy and ‘fosters a culture of caring and sharing.’ 

Do you know about any other ways in which Singapore is tackling NDD? Have you been part of any in the past?

Until the next one!

 

How can you tell the ocean is friendly?…..It waves! smiley

Posted in Nature-deficit disorder | Leave a comment

How to combat NDD – societal level

It’s important to keep in mind that NDD is not merely a problem on a individual level but for society as a whole. We are all affected by environmental degradation, and society is heading down a dangerous path. Thus, it becomes a responsibility of the state to get involved. What are some ways they can do this?

1) Ensure that there are nature areas which are safe and easily available to the public.

2) Get involved with education reforms.

3) Initiate programs for children to connect with nature, and get involved with conservation efforts.

In my opinion number 1 is by far the most important. Singapore as an island struggles with space. This means something’s gotta give, however, the government must keep in mind the importance of having a green patch to play in.

I am not very familiar with the involvement of the government in areas such as NDD. I’ll put on my research cap and do a future post on what they have been doing!

Until then I just want to share about the No Child Left Inside movement in USA. It was inspired by NDD, and aims to incorporate high quality environmental education into curriculums, as well as extending the classroom to the local environment.

You can read more about it here. It’s reception has been generally positive!

Until the next one!

 

music    Don’t it always seem to go…That you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone; They paved paradise, And put up a parking lot. –  Joni Mitchell, Big Yellow Taxi (song)

  smiley

 

 

 

Posted in Nature-deficit disorder | Leave a comment

How to combat NDD – educational level

I came across an interesting study while researching this post that really caught my attention. The American Institutes for Research looked at the impact of a week-long outdoor education program for at-risk youths. The results were: a 27% increase in mastery of science concepts; better problem solving-skills; enhanced self-esteem; improved conflict resolution; improved relationships with peers; and increased motivation to learn. All this compared to a control group that remained in the classroom and that did not see these results.

This makes salient the fact that NDD should not only be the parent’s problem, but that education systems need to stand up and take note as well.

How can they go about getting involved?

Louv asserts that it is no enough to simply tweak curriculums to include more on the environment; future directions must also work towards widening the definition of the classroom. In Louv’s words, ‘policy-makers must view parks, wildlands, farms and ranches as the new schoolyards.’ This line of thinking is indeed being implemented in different education programs in America.

child

(via teachingmybabytoread.com)

To illustrate the ways in which education systems can steer children away from NDD, I think it would be good to share about a particular model I came across. This is the EIC model developed by the State Education and Environment Roundtable (‘a cooperative endeavor of education agencies’ covering 16 states). It stands for Environment as an Integrating Context. Its main tenet that is relevant here is using the ‘local natural and community surroundings as the context for learning.’ One teacher involved declares faith in the program, saying that the children are creating memories that last, remembering what they did rather than merely what they learnt. This highlights the difference between simple instruction on environmental topics, and actual contact and integration with it.

For more on this program and its results click here (short overview) or here (official website).

Next up, we look at the societal level…stay tuned!

barney Research says Barney should have class outside…  smiley         (via pinterest)

Posted in Nature-deficit disorder | Leave a comment

Fostering an environmental identity in our little ones

In this blog we’ve discussed EI and established that it can indeed lead to greater concern for the environment, as well as pro-environmental behavior. So how can we encourage the development of EI in our children?

Identities are formed early on, especially when it comes to nature. According to research, between early and middle childhood there is a window of opportunity for children to connect to nature. At early childhood (3-6 years old) they begin to acquaint themselves with the plant and animal world, forming utilitarian connections (giving natural objects meaning in relation to themselves). At middle childhood (6-12), they make connections to the larger natural world, seeing nature not merely as an instrument to fulfill their own needs and desires, but as part of something bigger. Also important to highlight, is the anthropomorphic projection prevalent in early childhood. This is particularly important for developing an EI through empathy.

Children also develop an emotional affinity for nature when they are regularly exposed to it, and thus given the chance to form positive memories tied to it. But remember –

 

concret IS NOT THE SAME AS:  real

      (cloudywind via flickr)                                                                                (via flickr)

 

Furthermore, contact with and exposure to animals can lead to a biocentric outlook (seeing nature as having value on its own, not only to the extent that its useful for humans) which can then generalize later in life to broader environmental care.

bunny

(dittofam.blogspot.sg)

Lastly, a child’s formation of an EI is influenced by the adults that surround them – how they view nature and whether they interact with it. Parents can pass on a respect for nature, and act as role models. Adults are particularly important because interactions with nature in a social context are very powerful in creating an EI. Since it is the parents who spend the most time with children at early childhood, it’s advisable they take them on outdoor trips. Later on in development, when peer relationships become more important, it’s a great opportunity to organize group outings for the children that involve nature.

 

If we want the future stewards of our earth to feel connected to nature, and to care for it, it’s really a matter of exposure and connection. Give them a chance to form memories, to experience nature to its fullest, and don’t forget to be the best role model you can be!

 

 

“Only as a child’s awareness and reverence for the wholeness of life are developed can his humanity to his own kind reach its full development.”Rachel Carson (marine biologist, conservationist, author of Silent Springsmiley

Posted in Environmental Identity | Leave a comment

How to combat NDD – parental level

Here are some ways to prevent/combat NDD as a parent, taken straight from the man himself – Richard Louv.

1) Encourage camping trips with the family.

2) Go for hikes / nature walks (plenty of places to do that here!).

3) Invent nature games – for example, seeing who can spot the most birds, or pick up the most white-coloured seashells.

4) Plant a garden / grow something with your children.

5) Encourage children to build things with nature – sandcastles, forts, treehouses, huts etc. – the more imaginative the better.

6) Introduce “the green hour” into family life. This is a daily hour of unstructured play and interaction with the natural world. Unstructured play means the children can generate the stimulation and be free to create, rather than following instructions.

Remember that these are not intended as chores, but rather as opportunities to relieve stress. There are just some recommendations but of course the sky is the limit. See if you guys can think of any better ways, or if you remember how you interacted with nature as a child!

beach

(Wee Heng via aspirant.sg)

 

 

“What a waste of time I had exploring pulau ubin, my children hated it” – Said no-one. Ever . smiley

Posted in Nature-deficit disorder | Leave a comment

Gap between environmental identity and behavior – Part 1

As promised here is a post about when EI doesn’t lead to pro-environmentalist behavior.

Many factors can come into play when determining pro-environmental behavior. These can overshadow potential effects of identity. Let’s start by looking at external factors, which originate from outside the individual. Here are the main ones worth considering:

1) Behavioral affordances.

This refers to what is allowed or facilitated by the physical and social environment. This is frequently overlooked but as you can see it’s basic common sense. Motivation becomes irrelevant if our situation prevents us from acting pro-environmentally. An example is when we have no control over air conditioning but we are freezing our buns off in the classroom. This happens a lot at NTU, because most classrooms don’t have their own AC unit.

Aside from situations hindering sustainable behavior, they can also be designed to facilitate/promote it. Universities such as NUS and NTU now have recycling bins all around campus, making it everyday practice to recycle.

recylce

(nus.edu.sg)

2) Norms (moral and social).

We look to others to guide our behavior, as society rewards conformity. This is particularly true in collectivist countries like Singapore. Interestingly, norms may not influence behavior on a conscious level, as people will often dismiss them as the reason behind their pro-environmental behavior.

Norms have proven to be more powerful then simply providing information about how to be environmentally responsible, thus they are now used in many campaign strategies. 

Moral norms can also be powerful, as caring for the environment can be considered an issue of right and wrong.

If we think carefully, many norms in our society can promote unsustainable behavior, but others, especially in Singapore, can be pro-environmental. The one that comes to mind is the norm on littering. Whenever I meet expats who just arrived in Singapore, and they throw a cigarette on the ground, the social disapproval and gasps of astonishment they are met with sees them instantly pick it back up in a flurry. This never fails to make me giggle!

I also can’t help but mention STOMP. I think the picture below says it all.

Screen shot 2014-10-27 at PM 08.15.42(screenshot stomp.com.sg)

3) Reinforcement contingencies.

This is based on the principles of operant conditioning  (psychology students will be familiar with this). Basically it dictates that behaviors with positive consequences are likely to be repeated, whilst those with negative consequences become less frequent. In some cases, there may be incentives to act unsustainably, getting in the way of what an environmental identity may encourage you to do. An example is the attention and admiration we get if we drive a cool car.

pick up chicks

(via quickmeme)

In other circumstances we may get punished for acting sustainably, such as frequent breakdowns in the MRT. If this were to get worse, it could potentially encourage more people to buy cars (if they can afford it).

 

Alright, so those are some of the factors that influence our behavior. This post is intended to illustrate that EI is not a sure way to promote sustainability. Human beings are complex, and this post itself is just a glimpse into some of the ways we are influenced. Hope you enjoyed reading!

 

 

How do trees get on the internet?……They log in! smiley

Posted in Environmental Identity | Leave a comment