Introducing ‘Rethinking Research’

The first in a series of essays on reproducibility of scientific research. How do we know which scientific results to trust? Research published in peer-reviewed academic journals has typically been considered the gold standard, having been subjected to in-depth scrutiny — or so we once thought. In recent years, our faith in peer-reviewed research has been shaken by the revelation that many published findings don’t hold up when scholars try to reproduce them. The question of which science to trust no longer seems straightforward. Read More

About Chua Junjie

Junjie is a Scholarly Communication librarian (research impact and copyright). He has an honours degree in Psychology from NUS and a Masters of Information Studies from NTU. In his free time, he enjoys learning foreign languages, playing the piano, fine arts, fiddling with R programming, inferential statistics – e.g. GLMs, predictive modelling & more.

21. February 2018 by Chua Junjie
Categories: Planning, Research & Analytics, Scholarly Publishing & Impact | Tags: , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *


Skip to toolbar