Home  ➞  Iconology  ➞  Interpretations  ➞  Detail

Iconology of the Wayfarer Triptych – Detail

Location of Visual Attribute
Interior Panels of the Wayfarer Triptych
#836
Couple in a pink tent with clothes on shore from An Allegory of Intemperance

… the New Haven fragment, we find mere a mixture of both gluttony and lust [Eisler, 1961, 44-48]. (p. 245)

Silver, 2006
Hieronymus Bosch

Keywords
Category
Morality and immorality
Interpretation Type
InfoSensorium Facet
(Sum, 2022)
Layer of meaning
(van Straten, 1994)
Conception of Information
(Furner, 2004)
Level of knowledge
(Nanetti, 2018)
View of reality
(Popper, 1972, 1979; Gnoli, 2018)
Iconographical interpretation Relevance (Iconographical) Interpretations,Narratives Second world (Mind)
Reference Source(s)
Eisler, 1961
Symbolic Content

#759
Couple in a pink tent with clothes on shore from An Allegory of Intemperance

The Louvre Ship [Bosch, ca. 1475-1500], decked with greenery, filled with tipplers and barrels, and trailed by thirsty swimmers, is matched in the Rabinowitz panel by a burly trumpeter astride a barrel. He holds a branch of the same greenery and is escorted by swimmers who resemble those who follow the Louvre bark. Moreover, the hint of amorous relations between the two central figures in the Ship, a lute-playing nun and a monk bobbing for a pancake on either side of a board that bears a plate of cherries, is made more explicit in the Rabinowitz painting by a couple drinking within a tent [Cuttler, 1969, 272-276]. Previous scholars had remarked the striking stylistic similarities between the two paintings [Hannema, 1936, 32f. de Tolnay, 1937, 90; Baldass, 1938, 68-69; Baldass, 1943, 235; Venturi, 1945, 63-64; Combe, 1946, 82; Eisler, 1961, 46], and after the Rabinowitz panel was given to Yale in 1959, Charles Seymour advanced a concrete reconstruction [”Reconstruction of Ship of Fools after Seymour”, 1984]. He suggested that the Yale panel had originally formed the lower part of the Ship of Fools, and that since the dimensions resulting from such a combination matched almost exactly those of Bosch’s Death and the Miser in the National Gallery in Washington [Bosch, ca. 1485-1490], this panel was probably originally a pendant to it [Seymour, 1961, 36].(p. 295) (p. 295)

Morganstern, 1984
The Rest of Bosch’s Ship of Fools

#813
Couple in a pink tent with clothes on shore from An Allegory of Intemperance

Certainly images of courtly love bowers figure prominently within calendar page illustrations, particularly for the lusty spring months of April and May. Half a century after Bosch, Pieter Bruegel’s drawing design for a print of Spring [Bruegel, 1565 (Der Frühling)] still features not only the preparation of a formal garden under a matron’s careful supervision in the foreground but also, at its vanishing point, a love bower, where feasting, drinking, and music as well as boating provide conducive conditions for lovemaking. [Silver, 2006, 400:note 37; van der Heyden, 1570; Bening, ca. 1515; Orenstein, 2001, 236-238: no. 105-106; Wieck, 1988, 45-54]… Once more, it should be recalled that these are precisely the kinds of activities condemned elsewhere by Bosch as the sin of luxuria in his Prado table tabletop [Bosch, ca. 1505-1510] and in his wing panel of… an Allegory of Gluttony. Indeed, such activities mark gardens of love (sometimes with added ascetic figures to be discovered) in later Flemish and Dutch painting, from Pieter Pourbus, Allegory of True Love [Pourbus, c. 1547] to a nascent seventeenth-century genre of “merry companies,’ where well-dressed young aristocrats feast and flirt in outdoor garden settings [Silver, 2006, 400:note 38; Huvenne, 1979; Nevitt, 2003, 21-98; de Bruyn, 1604; de Bruyn, 1601; Hellerstedt, 1986, 42-44, no. 16; Renger, 1976, 190-203; Nichols, 1992, 32-42]. (pp. 52-53)

Silver, 2006
Hieronymus Bosch