Home ➞ Iconology ➞ Interpretations Iconology of the Wayfarer Triptych Table View Explore by: # Keywords⚆ Visual Attributes Iconology - Filter Painting An Allegory of Intemperance Death and the Miser Ship of Fools The Pedlar Visual Objects Carried out by Category Aspects of time Bible and biblical stories Christianity and the Church Earth and world Human being and life Intention, will and state of being Literary and mythical characters and objects Morality and immorality Non-Christian religions Planets and zodiacal signs Reasoning, judgement and intelligence Scientific perspectives and methods Social conduct and emotions Social life, culture and activities Society and social classes Supernaturalism and magic Keywords Indulgence Refers to "Carrus Navalis in Schönbartbuch", 16th century "Carrus Navalis in Schönbartbuch", 1908 "Death, from Grandes heures de Rohan", ca. 1401-1500 "Deathbed, from The Hours of Catherine of Cleves", ca. 1440 "de l’ouïe et du goût", ca. 1510-1520 "Detail, infrared reflectogram image of Death and the Miser", 1982 "Flight into Egypt", ca. 1500 "La barque d’Ëve", ca. 1510-1520 "May, from Hours of Joanna I of Castile", ca. 1486-1506 "Pedlar, from The Luttrell Psalter", ca. 1325-1340 "Psalter of Eleanor of Aquitaine", ca. 1185 "Reconstruction of Ship of Fools after Seymour", 1984 "Saturn, from Astrological treatises", 15th century "Saturn and his children, from Passauer Calendar", 1445 "Terra, from Engelberg Crucifix", ca. 1200 "The Tree of Life", 1502 Abraham, Levy & Cantera, 1939 Adhémar, 1962 Aertsen, 1556 Aesop, ca. 1501 Agrippa, 1910 Ainsworth, 2010 Ainsworth et al., 2012 Alexandre, 1892 Allberry, 1938 Allegory of Chasity at the Bardi Chapel, ca. 1325 Altdorfer, ca. 1515-1516 Anthonisz, 1541 Antoninus, 1449 Antwerper Liedboek, 1544 Ariès, 1981 Ars moriendi, ca. 1415-1450 Ars moriendi, ca. 1474 Atkins, 2017 Augustodunensis, ca. 1080-1156 Avé-Lallemant, 1858 Badius, 1498 Badius, 1498 (Frontispiece) Badius, 1500 Badius, 1502 Baldass, 1926 Baldass, 1938 Baldass, 1943 Baldass, 1959 Baldass, 1968 Baldini, ca. 1464 Baltrusaitis, 1955 Barbado, 1931 Bass & Wyckoff, 2015 Bauer, 1989 Bax, 1948 Bax, 1949 Bax, 1953 Bax, 1962 Bax, 1979 Bayley, 1919 Bayot, 1929 Beagle, 1982 Bedaux & Ekkart, 2000 Beer, 1957 Beets, 1938 Beets, 1946 Beets, 1954 Beham, 1535 Beham, ca. 1530-1562 Bellaert, 1486 Benesch, 1937 Benesch, 1957 Bening, 1500 Bening, ca. 1515 Bening, ca. 1530 Bergmans, 1936 Bevers, 1986 Bidez & Cumont, 1938 Biesheuvel, 2005 Bigwood, 1921 Binski, 1996 Bishop, 1918 Bisschop & Verwijs, 1870 Bloch, 1912 Bloemaert, After 1635 Bloomfield, 1952 Boczkowska, 1971 Bohnert, 1985 Boll & Bezold, 1931 Boll, 1913 Bolswert, ca. 1610-1620 Bonenfant, 1958 Boon, 1968 Bosch, 15th century Bosch, 16th century Bosch, ca. 1475 Bosch, ca. 1475-1500 Bosch, ca. 1485 Bosch, ca. 1485-1490 Bosch, ca. 1490-1495 Bosch, ca. 1490-1500 Bosch, ca. 1494 (Ecce Homo) Bosch, ca. 1494 (Triptych of Adoration of the Magi) Bosch, ca. 1495–1500 Bosch, ca. 1498 Bosch, ca. 1500 Bosch, ca. 1500 (Johannes auf Patmos) Bosch, ca. 1500 (Temptations of St. Anthony) Bosch, ca. 1500 (The Pedlar) Bosch, ca. 1501-1505 Bosch, ca. 1504-1508 Bosch, ca. 1505 Bosch, ca. 1505-1510 Bosch, ca. 1510 Bosch, ca. 1512-1515 Bosch, ca. 1520-1545 Boschère, 1947 Bosing, 1987 Brabant, ca. 1460 Brands, 1921 Brans, 1948 Brant, 1494 Brant, 1498 Brant, 1498 (Frontispiece) Brant, 1500 Brant, 1854 Brant, 1944 Brant, 1962 Brant, 2011 Briffault, 1927 Brion, 1938 Brody, 1974 Bruegel, 1559 (Die niederländischen Sprichwörter) Bruegel, 1559 (Misanthropist) Bruegel, 1559 (The Fight between Carnival and Lent) Bruegel, 1562 Bruegel, 1564 Bruegel, 1565 Bruegel, 1565 (Der Frühling) Bruegel, 1567 Bruegel, 1568 Bruegel, 1568 (Les Mendiants ou Les Culs-de-jatte) Bruegel, 1568 (The Blind Leading the Blind) Bruegel, 1568 (The Magpie on the Gallows) Bruegel, 1574 Bruegel, ca. 1600-1624 Brummel, 1949 Bunyan, 1678 Burlington Fine Arts Club, 1908 Buytewech, ca. 1591-1624 Bücken & Steyaert, 2013 Calkins, 1978 Carefree living, ca. 1560 Cartellieri, 1929 Cats, 1642 Chailley, 1978 Chew, 1962 Ciceron, 1938 Cinotti, 1966 Cirlot, 1962 Cluse, 2000 Cohen, 1909 (Die Ausstellung des Goldenen Vlieses in Bru_gge, 1907) Cohen, 1909 (Hieronymus Bosch) Colenbrander, 2003 Combe, 1946 Combe, 1957 Comestor, ca. 1440 Condivi, 1927 Conway, 1921 Cooper, 1982 Crul, 1920 Cumont, 1942 Cuttler, 1957 Cuttler, 1968 Cuttler, 1969 D'Overflacque_e, 1932 Damascenus, 1879 Dante, ca. 1308-1321 Das Schiff der Flust, ca. 1360 da Vinci, ca. 1591-1624 de Beer, 1990 de Boschère, 1947 de Bruyn, 1601 de Bruyn, 1604 de Bruyn, 2001 de Bruyn, 2001 (Hieronymous Bosch's So-Called Prodigal Son Tondo) de Bruyn, 2017 de Cock, 1905 de Coster, 1867 de Diguleville, 1922 de Diguleville, ca. 1330-1331 (Pèlerinage de la vie humaine) de Diguleville, ca. 1330-1331 (Ship of Religion) de Haas, 1942 de Jode, 1590s de Jongh, 2000 de Julleville, 1889 de Laborde, 1929 Delaissé, 1959 Delevoy, 1960 Delevoy, 1990 de Mirimonde, 1971 Demonts, 1919 Demonts, 1920 de Mooij, 1992 de Mély, 1904 Der Melancholiker, 15th century de Roover, 1948 de Roover, 1967 Der verlorene Sohn beim Spiel im Freudenhaus, ca. 1520 de Tervarent, 1945 de Tervarent, 1958 de Tollenaere, 1941 de Tolnay, 1935 de Tolnay, 1937 de Tolnay, 1965 de Tolnay, 1966 Detroit Institute Arts, 1960 Devoghelaere, 1937 De Vos, 1967 Die vier Temperamente, ca. 1481 Dixon, 2003 Dolan, 1964 Donatello, ca. 1457-1464 Drescher, 1908 du Hameel, ca. 1478-1506 Dülberg, 1929 Dürer, 1494 (Frontispiece of Daß Narrenschyff ad Narragoniam) Dürer, 1494 (Of Serenading at Night) Dürer, 1514 Eisler, 1946 Eisler, 1946 (Zodiacal trines) Eisler, 1961 Eisler, 1977 Eliade, 1959 Elst, 1944 Elst, 1946 Encyclopaedia Judaica, 1971 Engler, 1962 English Standard Version Bible, 2001 Enklaar, 1922 Enklaar, 1933 Enklaar, 1937 Enklaar, 1940 Enklaar, 1956 Erasmus, 1828 Erasmus, 1913 Essling & Müntz, 1902 Fabre-Vassas, 1997 Falkenburg, 1988 Faris, 1914 Fierens, 1936 Fierens, 1947 Fischart, 1969 Fischer, 2016 Follower of Dreux Jean, ca. 1468-1477 Follower of Jheronimus Bosch, 15th century Follower of Jheronimus Bosch, ca. 1485-1490 Follower of Jheronimus Bosch, ca. 1555-1575 Follower of Jheronimus Bosch, ca. 1560 Follower of Jheronimus Bosch, ca. 1561 Follower of Pieter Bruegel, ca. 1550-1575 Follower of Pieter Huys, ca. 1560 Fourcaud, 1912 Fraenger, 1930 Fraenger, 1950 Fraenger, 1951 Fraenger, 1975 Fraenger, 1999 Francis, 1942 Frankfurter, 1952 Frey, 1957 Friedländer, 1927 Friedländer, 1935 Friedländer, 1969 Galle, ca. 1565 Ganz, 1924 Gaspar, 1932 Gerlach, 1939 Gerlach, 1978 Gerlach, 1979 Gibson, 1973 Gibson, 1973 (Hieronymus Bosch and the Dutch tradition) Gibson, 1973 (Hieronymus Bosch and the Mirror of Man) Gibson, 1983 Glück, 1904 Glück, 1933 Gossaert, 1919 Gossaert, ca. 1513-1515 Gossart, 1907 Gotthelf, 1948 Grimm, 1911 Gringore, 1512 Grossmann, 1955 Gundel, 1922 Gutekunst, 1899 Gérard, 1486-1487 Habig, 1973 Hals, ca. 1616-1617 Hammerstein, 1962 Hampe, 1902 Hand & Wolff, 1986 Hand, 1965 Hannema, 1931 Hannema, 1936 Hansen, 1984 Harms, 1970 Harrebomée, 1858 Harrebomée, 1861 Harrebomée, 1870 Harris, 1995 Hartau, 2001 Hartau, 2001 (Suche nach Glück bei nahem Untergang) Hartau, 2002 Hartau, 2005 Hartau, 2005 (Bosch and the Jews) Hartmann, 1493 Hauber, 1916 Heidrich, 1910 Heimann, 1990 Heitz, 1906 Hellerstedt, 1986 Hentze, 1932 Heremans, 1877 Hermans, 1867 Hildebrand, 1911 Hildegarde, 1903 Hilka, Schumann & Meyer, 1970 Hind, 1970 Holbein, ca. 1523 - 1525 Hollstein, 1949 Hooffacker, 1988 Horenbout, Bening & Bening, ca. 1510 (Mai) Horenbout, Bening & Bening, ca. 1515–1520 Huebner, 1943 Huebner, 1971 Huizinga, 1919 Hummelen, 1958 Huvenne, 1979 Ilsink, 2013 Ilsink, 2016 Ilsink et al., 2016 Ivanov, 1976 Janson, 1952 Jean de La Fontaine's philosophy, 17th century Jeltes, 1927 Jonas, 1958 Jonas, 1963 Justi, 1908 Kalff, 1884 Kalff, 1907 Kalff, 1923 Kasten, 1992 Kaye, 1998 Kempis, 1505 Klibansky, Panofsky & Saxl, 1964 Kohlhaussen, 1968 Koldeweij, Kooij & Vermet, 2001 Koldeweij, Vandenbroeck & Vermet, 2001 Konneker, 1966 Koomen, 1932 Koreny, 1986 Kozàky, 1944 Kren, McKendrick & Ainsworth, 2003 Kruyskamp, 1940 Labonnardiere, 1957 Laborde, 1923 Lacombe, 1963 Laenen, 1904 Lafond, 1914 Lammertse & van der Coelen, 2015 Lammertse, 1994 Lammertse, 2017 Langendijk, 1715 Laurent, ca. 1290-1300 (Gluttony) Laurent, ca. 1295 (Avarice) Leeber, 1939-1940 Leendertz Jr., 1907 Leendertz Jr., 1925 Leeu, 1492 Lefebvre, 1968 Le Goff, 1979 Lehrs, 1906 Leidinger, 1935 Le Juif errant: un témoin du temps, 2001 Lennep & Gouw, 1868 Le Tavernier & Miélot, ca. 1456 Le Tavernier & Miélot, ca. 1470 Leuvense Bijdragen IV, 1900-1902 Leuvense Bijdragen IX, 1910-1911 Levelt, 1924 Leymarie, 1949 Lindener, 1558 Lindner, 1912 Linfert, 1989 Lippmann, 1895 Liébault, 1582 Lottin, 1950 Lugt, 1968 Lurker, 1960 Lyna & van Eeghem, 1932 Långfors, 1921 Långfors, 1924 Maeterlinck, 1907 Mannhardt, 1858 Marijnissen, 1972 Marijnissen, 1976 Marijnissen, 1977 Marijnissen, 1987 Marijnissen, 2007 Maroto, 2001 Maroto, 2017 Marrow, 1977 Martindale & Bacchesch, 1969 Massys, 16th century Massys, ca. 1520-1525 Master of the Housebook, ca. 1475 Master of the Virgin among Virgins, ca. 1490 Mâle, 1908 Meadow, 1992 Meijer, 1946 Meiss, 1974 (French painting in the time of Jean de Berry) Meiss, 1974 (The Limbourgs and their contemporaries) Mellinkoff, 1993 Meurgey, 1930 Meyling, 1946 Michelangelo, 1533 Millar, 1953 Misero I, ca. 1465 Mollat, 1966 Monogrammist, ca. 1530 Morganstern, 1982 Morganstern, 1984 Moser, 1431 Moser, 1961 Mosmans, 1931 Mosmans, 1947 Moxey, 1985 Moxey, 1989 Müller, 1934 Nahuys, 1888 Nelson, 1969 Neumann, 1950 Neurdenburg, 1910 Nevitt, 2003 Newhauser, 1986 Nichols, 1992 Nielsen, 1904 Noonan, 1957 O'Brien-Moore, 1924 O'Connor, 1942 Offner & Steinweg, 1979 Olds, 1966 Oosterman, 2001 Orenstein, 2001 Owst, 1953 Panofsky & Saxl, 1933 Panofsky, 1939 Panofsky, 1953 Panofsky, Giehlow & Saxl, 1923 Parker, 2020 Parshall, 2001 Petrarch, 1532 Pfister, 1922 Philip, 1953 Philip, 1955 Philip, 1956 Philip, 1958 Philip, 1969 Pigler, 1950 Pleij, 1979 Pleij, 1983 Postan, 1963 Pourbus, c. 1547 Provoost, ca. 1515-1521 Puyvelde, 1956 Pächt, 1948 Pächt, 1950 Quarles, 1638 Quinot, 1962 Rabutaux, 1881 Rembert, 2004 Rembrandt, 1635 Renesse, 1900 Renger, 1969 Renger, 1970 Renger, 1976 Renouard, 1964 Reuterswärd, 1970 Rietstap, 1861 Ritter, Plessner & Mayriti, 1962 Romein & Romein, 1938 Roscher, 1878 Rosenberg, 1961 Rossiter, 1973 Rost, 16th century Rowlands, 1979 Ryckaert, ca. 1649 Saintyves, 1937 Sanger, 1897 Santurn (Lehrs), 15th century Sassen, 1885 Saturn (in Rome manuscript), 16th century Saturn (in Salone di Padua), 12th century Saturn (in Schermermar manuscript), 15th century Saturn and his 'Children' (Panofsky), 15th century Scaha gustationis sultae, 1500 Scháufelein, ca. 1525 Schedel, 1493 Schmitt, 1948 Schoemaker, ca. 1710-1735 Schönsperger, 1922 Schreiber & Zimmermann, 1937 Schreiber, 1926 Schretlen, 1925 Schürmeyer, 1923 Schwartz, 1997 Schwarz & Plagemann, 1937 Seligmann, 1953 Seymour, 1961 Shachar, 1974 Shestack, 1967 Silver, 1977 Silver, 1983 Silver, 1984 Silver, 1996 Silver, 2001 Silver, 2006 Silver, 2006 (Peasant scenes and landscapes) Silver, 2017 Sloet, 1890 Smeyers & Van der Stock, 1996 Smits, 1933 Snellaert, 1488 Solier, 1961 Speculum humanae salvationis, ca. 1466-1467 Spronk, 1998 Steen, ca. 1670 Stein-Schneider, 1984 Stoett, 1932 Stone-Ferrier, 1983 Strauss, 1926 Strauss, 1974 Stridbeck, 1956 Stürzinger, 1893 Suchier & Birch-Hirschfeld, 1913 Sudeck, 1931 Swain, 1932 Swelinck, 1627 Tallqvist, 1948 Tenenti, 1952 Tentler, 2003 Tentler, 2005 Terence, 2nd century BC The eating of the passover lamb, from Historia Scholastica, ca. 1450-1455 Thiele, 1898 Tinbergen, 1907 Titian, 1518 Tóth-Ubbens, 1987 Tuttle, 1981 Tuve, 1966 Universitätsbibliothek Basel & Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg im Breisgau, 1994 Valentiner & Suida, 1949 Valerius, 1942 van Andel, 1928 van Bastelaer, 1908 van Camp, 2017 van den Bossche, 1944 Vandenbroeck, 1981 Vandenbroeck, 1985 Vandenbroeck, 1987 Vandenbroeck, 1987 (Beeld van de andere, vertoog over het zelf) Vandenbroeck, 1989 Vandenbroeck, 2001 Vandenbroeck, 2002 Vandenbroeck, 2017 van der Heyden, 1559 van der Heyden, 1562 van der Heyden, 1562 (Marskramer door apen beroofd) van der Heyden, 1567 van der Heyden, 1570 van der Heyden, ca. 1551-1570 van der Heyden, ca. 1558 van de Venne, ca. 1625 Vandeweghe, 2017 van Dis & Erné, 1939 van Duyse, 1908 van Eyck, 1434 van Hemessen, 1536 van Hemessen, 1543 van Hemessen, ca. 1540 van Leyden, 1520 van Leyden, ca. 1520-1530 van Luttervelt, 1958 van Mander, 1604 van Meckenem, 15th century van Oestvoren, 1413 van Oostsanen, 1517 van Os, 1488 van Tricht, ca. 1492 van Wavere, ca. 1515 Venturi, 1945 Vermeylen, 1939 Verwijs & Verdam, 1885-1929 Verwijs, 1860 Verwijs, 1871 Vetter, 1955 Veurman & Bax, 1944 Vinken & Schlüter, 2000 Vinken, 1958 Visscher, 1614 von der Vogelweide, ca. 12-13th century von Eschenbach, ca. 1200-1210 von Fallersleben, 1855 von Fallersleben, 1968 von Kaysersberg, 1510 von Kaysersberg, 1511 von Seidlitz, 1935 Vostre, 1502 Wagner, 1845 Walker, 1975 Welsford, 1935 Werner, 1960 Wertheim Aymès, 1957 Wescher, 1946 Wieck, 1988 Wierix, ca. 1568 Wierix, ca. 1604 Wilhelm, 1990 Willshire, 1883 Winkel, 1922 Winkler, 1924 Winkler, 1951 Winternitz, 1967 Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal II, 1882 Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal III, 1912 Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal IV, 1916 Workshop of Orcagna, 15th-16th century Workshop of Taddeo Gaddi, 14th century Yamey, 1989 Zupnick, 1968 Refers To (Title) Contains symbolic references TextualVisual Types of Interpretation Conception of Information According to Furner (2004) Utterances Situations Thoughts Informativeness Relevance (Iconographical) Relevance (Iconological) Communication Layers of meaning According to van Straten (1994) Views of reality According to Popper (1972, 1979) & Gnoli (2018) Levels of knowledgeAccording to Nanetti (2018) If you are human, leave this field blank. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Filter Entries Show All Δ 44 interpretations found. #44 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools Some of the motifs in the Louvre painting have striking connections with Flemish manuscript illuminations of Bosch’s own day. Monks in a boat shown parallel to the picture plane, as in Bosch’s panel, can be found in several manuscripts that illustrate the Miracles de Nostre Dame [Le Tavernier & Miélot, ca. 1456; Le Tavernier & Miélot, ca. 1470]. One of these, now in Paris, and probably made in the Tavernier shop in Bruges in the 1470’s, shows a group of monks on a pleasure outing in a boat [Delaissé, 1959, pl. 59]. They are frightened by the sight of devils carrying off the soul of an apostate. In fear of drowning from demonic attack, they pray to the Virgin for aid, which is given to them [Laborde, 1929, I; 33ff]. The scene is clearly not an exact parallel to Bosch’s painting, but it does portray monks in a boat engaged in what the text implies is pleasure-seeking, and thus sinful behavior. From this we may conclude that a boating party and sinful monks were readily associated ideas in Bosch’s time (p.273)d Cuttler, 1969 Bosch and the Narrenschiff: a problem in relationships #104 Couple in a pink tent with clothes on shore from An Allegory of Intemperance … worldly vice of luxury…show the combination of lust and indulgence known among the Seven Sins as luxuria. We can easily compare the scene of Luxuria from the Seven Deadly Sins panel, which displays a similar combination of rich costume, taste, and eros [Bosch, ca. 1505-1510]. (p.630) Silver, 2001 God in the Details: Bosch and Judgment(s) #106 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools … worldly vice of luxury…show the combination of lust and indulgence known among the Seven Sins as luxuria. We can easily compare the scene of Luxuria from the Seven Deadly Sins panel [Bosch, ca. 1505-1510], which displays a similar combination of rich costume, taste, and eros…we find there some of the same costly foodstuffs (especially cherries and roast fowl) and wine flasks, as well as a fool in his standard costume. (p.630) Silver, 2001 God in the Details: Bosch and Judgment(s) #107 Nun playing the lute from Ship of Fools Music (often an emblem of wasteful indulgence in Bosch, especially in the Hell wing of The Garden of Earthly Delights triptych) is common to both worlds of luxury, but the Prado panel contains both harp and recorder, while the Paris panel has only a lute. (p.630) Silver, 2001 God in the Details: Bosch and Judgment(s) #108 Nun playing the lute from Ship of Fools Ironically, these instruments tend to occur in images with angelic musicians in 15th-century Flemish paintings, presumably as prestige instruments associated with (heavenly) court life, in contrast to the more vulgar bagpipes and other peasant instruments. [Winternitz, 1967, 66-85, 129-149; Hammerstein, 1962; Brant, 1944, 186.] (p.647, note 19) Silver, 2001 God in the Details: Bosch and Judgment(s) #111 Nun and monk from Ship of Fools The presence of monks and nuns in the Ship of Fools further underscores the hypocrisy and folly of wrong behavior and personal indulgence (emblematized in the center of the boat by the giant hanging pancake, the traditional indulgence food of carnival). (p.630) Silver, 2001 God in the Details: Bosch and Judgment(s) #112 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools …the Paris-New Haven wing embodies a deadly sin here, luxury, both of gourmandise (rather than the sin of gluttony, with its own segment on the circle of sins) and of sexuality (note that the scene of the punishment for luxury in the Hell roundel of the Prado sins consists of a fornicating couple in bed with demons[Bosch, ca. 1505-1510, “The Seven Deadly Sins and the Four Last Things”]). (p.630) Silver, 2001 God in the Details: Bosch and Judgment(s) #115 Man on a barrel with five skinny men in the waters from An Allegory of Intemperance …profligate drinking, as manifested by the barrel-rider… (p.31) Hartau, 2005 (Bosch and the Jews) Bosch and the Jews #188 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools Zijn ook de losbandigen van Bosch Meifeest-vierders? Op hen is Jeroens symboliek evenzeer van toepassing als op Vastenavondgangers, zij is zelfs meer in overeenstemming met de tijd van het jaar, al zijn de kersen in Mei nog zeer zeldzaam en is het lover te vol voor de Meimaand. Hekelde de schilder ze dus naar aanleiding van uitspattingen bij een feest in de tweede helft van Juni of de eerste van Juli, bijv. het St-Jansfeest (24 Juni) [Bax, 1949, 140; Mosmans, 1931, 70; Enklaar, 1937, 68]? (p. 194) Bax, 1949 Ontcijfering van Jeroen Bosch #258 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools … show people wasting their lives on pleasure and wealth. (p. 24) Schwartz, 1997 Hieronymus Bosch: First impressions #259 Man on his deathbed with a chest from Death and the Miser … show people wasting their lives on pleasure and wealth. (p. 24) Schwartz, 1997 Hieronymus Bosch: First impressions #322 Old tavern from The Pedlar By around 1500 the motif and theme of the evil inn, encountered repeatedly in the late Middle Ages, had condensed into a symbol of all that was bad for the civic elite and the aristocracy… The evil inn motif is also found in… the Pedlar… (p. 114) Fischer, 2016 Jheronimus Bosch #380 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools The rejection of enjoyment and lust is expressed in Bosch’s work in themes like the Allegory of Gluttony (and Lechery) and the Ship of Fools (originally together on one panel); Shrove Tuesday, Singers in an Egg [Follower of Jheronimus Bosch, ca. 1561], Mock Tournament on the Ice [Follower of Pieter Huys, ca. 1560] and Tavern Scene – all of which only survive in the form of copies; the drawings of the Tree-Man [Bosch, ca. 1505] and the Witches [Bosch, 15th century] (who may also represent people celebrating Shrove Tuesday); and the Blue Ship [van der Heyden, 1559] and Merrymakers Sailing in a Mussel Shell [van der Heyden, 1562], which survive in the form of prints… They tell us how human beings fall into such misbehaviour when they fail to resist the blandishments of their senses [Badius, 1502; Follower of Jheronimus Bosch, ca. 1555-1575]. (p. 123ff) Koldeweij, Vandenbroeck & Vermet, 2001 Hieronymus Bosch. The Complete Paintings and Drawings #381 Man on a barrel with five skinny men in the waters from An Allegory of Intemperance The rejection of enjoyment and lust is expressed in Bosch’s work in themes like the Allegory of Gluttony (and Lechery) and the Ship of Fools (originally together on one panel); Shrove Tuesday, Singers in an Egg [Follower of Jheronimus Bosch, ca. 1561, “Concert in the egg”], Mock Tournament on the Ice [Follower of Pieter Huys, ca. 1560, “Grotesque Duel on the Ice”] and Tavern Scene – all of which only survive in the form of copies; the drawings of the Tree-Man [Bosch, ca. 1505, “The Tree man”] and the Witches [Bosch, 15th century, “Sorcières et monstres (Witches and monsters)”] (who may also represent people celebrating Shrove Tuesday); and the Blue Ship [van der Heyden, 1559, “Die Blau Schuyte (Ship of Fools)”] and Merrymakers Sailing in a Mussel Shell [van der Heyden, 1562, “Merrymakers in a mussel shell”], which survive in the form of prints… They tell us how human beings fall into such misbehaviour when they fail to resist the blandishments of their senses [Badius, 1502; Follower of Jheronimus Bosch, ca. 1555-1575, “Shrovetide and Lent”]. (p. 123ff) Koldeweij, Vandenbroeck & Vermet, 2001 Hieronymus Bosch. The Complete Paintings and Drawings #382 Couple in a pink tent with clothes on shore from An Allegory of Intemperance The rejection of enjoyment and lust is expressed in Bosch’s work in themes like the Allegory of Gluttony (and Lechery) and the Ship of Fools (originally together on one panel); Shrove Tuesday, Singers in an Egg [Follower of Jheronimus Bosch, ca. 1561], Mock Tournament on the Ice [Follower of Pieter Huys, ca. 1560] and Tavern Scene – all of which only survive in the form of copies; the drawings of the Tree-Man [Bosch, ca. 1505] and the Witches [Bosch, 15th century] (who may also represent people celebrating Shrove Tuesday); and the Blue Ship [van der Heyden, 1559] and Merrymakers Sailing in a Mussel Shell [van der Heyden, 1562], which survive in the form of prints… They tell us how human beings fall into such misbehaviour when they fail to resist the blandishments of their senses [Badius, 1502; Follower of Jheronimus Bosch, ca. 1555-1575]. (p. 123ff) Koldeweij, Vandenbroeck & Vermet, 2001 Hieronymus Bosch. The Complete Paintings and Drawings #390 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools … the pendant of Death and the Usurer as a panel that was sawn in two – the Ship of Fools and the Allegory of Gluttony. Together, the two scenes must have constituted a satire of licentious merrymakers, in which Bosch attacked the opposite of avarice – the intoxication of prodigality. (p. 139) Koldeweij, Vandenbroeck & Vermet, 2001 Hieronymus Bosch. The Complete Paintings and Drawings #391 Man on a barrel with five skinny men in the waters from An Allegory of Intemperance … the pendant of Death and the Usurer as a panel that was sawn in two – the Ship of Fools and the Allegory of Gluttony. Together, the two scenes must have constituted a satire of licentious merrymakers, in which Bosch attacked the opposite of avarice – the intoxication of prodigality. (p. 139) Koldeweij, Vandenbroeck & Vermet, 2001 Hieronymus Bosch. The Complete Paintings and Drawings #457 Couple in a pink tent with clothes on shore from An Allegory of Intemperance … the pendant of Death and the Usurer as a panel that was sawn in two – the Ship of Fools and the Allegory of Gluttony. Together, the two scenes must have constituted a satire of licentious merrymakers, in which Bosch attacked the opposite of avarice – the intoxication of prodigality. (p. 139) Koldeweij, Vandenbroeck & Vermet, 2001 Hieronymus Bosch. The Complete Paintings and Drawings #481 Figure with letter from Death and the Miser A winged and ratheaded demon emerging from underneath the chest holds up a paper sealed with red wax. It has been suggested that the paper is a letter of indulgence, a mortgage, a paper of false legitimacy, or a promissory note [Cuttler, 1968, 202; Cuttler, 1969, 275] Although there are no markings on the paper that would identify it as a specific type of document, it would seem likely that it refers to the money-making activities of misers, such as lending money at high rates of interest. Capitalism in the Netherlands of the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries resulted in an increasing use of paper credit as a substitute for hard currency. (p. 18) Hand & Wolff, 1986 Early Netherlandish Painting #620 Wooden gate with ox and bird from The Pedlar The spiritual analogy with the Prodigal Son [English Standard Version Bible, 2001, Luke, 15:11-32] is obvious: Here a son has been lost to God (just as Adam was) because in the idleness of his dissolute life he totally forgot that the six days of Creation should be the model for man’s creative daily work. Instead, he lived his lives according to the “six things the Lord doth hate,” which are likewise enumerated in Proverbs [English Standard Version Bible, 2001, Proverbs, 6:9-19]. (p. 265) Fraenger, 1999 Hieronymus Bosch #729 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools Mit den «Müßiggängerschiffen» (heißen sie nun «Narrenschiff»,«Leichtschiff», «Schluraffen Schiff», «Sint Reynuut» oder «Blauwe Schuit»)sollen die Müßiggänger satirisiert werden, die sich von der übrigen Gesellschaftabsondern. Das «Narrenschiff» wurde hauptsächlich gegen die Müßiggänger aufgerichtet. Die Passagiere dieser Fahrzeuge streben ein irdisches Paradies an, sie leben ms «Blaue» hinem [Leeber, 1939-1940; Enklaar, 1937, 35-85; Enklaar, 1940, 111], achten Jedoch nicht aufden «gemeinen Nutz» (res publica) und vergessen vor allem das Himmelreich. Sie ahnen nicht, daß die dünne Schale ihres Gefährtes sie nur wenigeZentimeter vom Tode trennt. Ihr sinnliches Treiben 1st Selbstbetrug, da ihr Ende naht. Diese – nach Meinung der Humanisten um 1500 – gottlosen Prasser und Schlemmer segeln ohne Steuer und Kompaß auf dem «Meerder Welt» ihrem sicheren Untergang entgegen. Die «Müßiggängerschiffe» sollen in satirisch-didaktischer Absicht sowohl vor dem persönlichenSchiffbruch wie vor dem «Schiffbruch» der Gemeinschaft und des Staateswarnen. Sie enthalten ein Gleichnis für «jedermann», um sich selbst zu erkennenund Maß zu halten. Diesem Impetus folgt auch Boschs «Narrenschiffo,das zu einem Laster-Triptychon gehört, das vor gefährlicher Armutund übertriebenem Reichtum warnen will. (pp. 167-168) Hartau, 2002 “Narrenschiffe” um 1500 #788 Ragged poor man from The Pedlar …the Rotterdam tondo represents a second and very different way in which poverty was conceived by the medieval mind: involuntary poverty, the affliction meted out to those who waste their substance in sinful indulgence. indulgence. Throughout medieval literature there are references to poverty as one of the wages of sin. In the Carmina Burana songs, for example, poverty is the typical fate of drunkards and profligates [Hilka, Schumann & Meyer, 1970]. One entire section of the Speculum Laicorum was devoted to drunkenness and its consequences, which included poverty [Owst, 1953, 426-427]. Sebastian Brant opens his chapter “On Gluttony and Feasting” in the Ship of Fools with: “He merits future poverty/ Who always lives in luxury/ And joins the spendthrift’s revelry.” [Brant, 1962, 96] The spendthrift’s ruination in the tavern was a favorite theme of popular literature and art in the sixteenth century, as Konrad Renger has shown in his book Lockerer Gesellschaft [Renger, 1970]. (p. 93) Tuttle, 1981 Bosch’s Image of Poverty #797 Left leg with bandage from The Pedlar The fact that the Rotterdam poor man has lost a shoe leads to the same conclusion. Drunkenness and consorting with prostitutes were condemned for being extravagant as well as sinful pastimes in the Middle Ages. They were denounced by moralists who formulated bleak descriptions of the consequences of such unseemly, immoderate activities [Owst, 1953, 425-441; Renger, 1970]. The loss of one’s clothing and particularly one’s shoes as a result of gambling and other forms of prodigality in the taverns was a familiar topos in such literature throughout the Middle Ages [Renger, 1970, 20; Tuttle, 1981, 94:note 60]. Popular texts that elaborated upon the parable of the Prodigal Son were convenient vehicles for the expression of these moralizations [Renger, 1970, 23-70]. One of the most poignant depictions of the Prodigal Son in poverty appears in a series of tondos, today in Basel, that illustrates the various episodes of the parable [Der verlorene Sohn beim Spiel im Freudenhaus, ca. 1520]. The Prodigal Son is shown in wretched poverty, seated before a meager fire. One of his shoes is missing. (p. 94) Tuttle, 1981 Bosch’s Image of Poverty #798 Hanging hoof amulet and white string from coat from The Pedlar The hoof appears to be associated with gluttony and lust – sins that were known to prosper in public houses. Within Bosch’s own oeuvre, hooves are shown in contexts that seem to establish this association. A hoof is portrayed on a banner flying above a tent that serves as a tavern and brothel in the fragment of a painting at Yale, Allegory of Gluttony and Lust [Bosch, ca. 1495–1500; de Tolnay, 1966, 94]. Another hoof is shown clutched in the greedy hand of the jug-holding glutton in the Seven Deadly Sins tabletop [Bosch, ca. 1505-1510; de Tolnay, 1966, 66]. The Rotterdam poor man’s hoof would thus suggest that he is guilty of similar carnal indulgences. (pp. 94-95) Tuttle, 1981 Bosch’s Image of Poverty #799 Catskin on backpack from The Pedlar The meaning of the catskin hanging on the poor man’s basket is more enigmatic. However, some popular association between dead cats and dissipation may be suggested by the appearance of another dead cat in the Basel tondo of the Prodigal Son in poverty. This popular association may have been current in Italy as well. Condivi’s explanation of the panther skin that Michelangelo’s figure of Bacchus holds states that the cat is dead because it is meant to symbolize the fatal consequences of dissolute living [Condivi, 1927, 28]. (p. 95) Tuttle, 1981 Bosch’s Image of Poverty #805 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools …lively nudes (and clothed figures) indulging their appetites for food and luxury with the implication of sex) also appear in a divided wing, shared by the Ship of Fools (Musee du Louvre, Paris) and Allegory of Gluttony (Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven) [Bosch, ca. 1495–1500] from a dismembered triptych [Morganstern, 1984, 295-302]. (p. 28) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #806 Couple in a pink tent with clothes on shore from An Allegory of Intemperance …lively nudes (and clothed figures) indulging their appetites for food and luxury with the implication of sex) also appear in a divided wing, shared by the Ship of Fools (Musee du Louvre, Paris) [Bosch, ca. 1475-1500] and Allegory of Gluttony (Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven) from a dismembered triptych [Morganstern, 1984, 295-302]. (p. 28) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #807 Man on a barrel with five skinny men in the waters from An Allegory of Intemperance …lively nudes (and clothed figures) indulging their appetites for food and luxury with the implication of sex) also appear in a divided wing, shared by the Ship of Fools (Musee du Louvre, Paris) [Bosch, ca. 1475-1500] and Allegory of Gluttony (Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven) from a dismembered triptych [Morganstern, 1984, 295-302]. (p. 28) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #812 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools Certainly images of courtly love bowers figure prominently within calendar page illustrations, particularly for the lusty spring months of April and May. Half a century after Bosch, Pieter Bruegel’s drawing design for a print of Spring [Bruegel, 1565 (Der Frühling)] still features not only the preparation of a formal garden under a matron’s careful supervision in the foreground but also, at its vanishing point, a love bower, where feasting, drinking, and music as well as boating provide conducive conditions for lovemaking. [Silver, 2006, 400:note 37; van der Heyden, 1570; Bening, ca. 1515; Orenstein, 2001, 236-238: no. 105-106; Wieck, 1988, 45-54]… Once more, it should be recalled that these are precisely the kinds of activities condemned elsewhere by Bosch as the sin of luxuria in his Prado table tabletop [Bosch, ca. 1505-1510] and in his wing panel of the Ship of Fools… Indeed, such activities mark gardens of love (sometimes with added ascetic figures to be discovered) in later Flemish and Dutch painting, from Pieter Pourbus, Allegory of True Love [Pourbus, c. 1547] to a nascent seventeenth-century genre of “merry companies,’ where well-dressed young aristocrats feast and flirt in outdoor garden settings [Silver, 2006, 400:note 38; Huvenne, 1979; Nevitt, 2003, 21-98; de Bruyn, 1604; de Bruyn, 1601; Hellerstedt, 1986, 42-44, no. 16; Renger, 1976, 190-203; Nichols, 1992, 32-42]. (pp. 52-53) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #813 Couple in a pink tent with clothes on shore from An Allegory of Intemperance Certainly images of courtly love bowers figure prominently within calendar page illustrations, particularly for the lusty spring months of April and May. Half a century after Bosch, Pieter Bruegel’s drawing design for a print of Spring [Bruegel, 1565 (Der Frühling)] still features not only the preparation of a formal garden under a matron’s careful supervision in the foreground but also, at its vanishing point, a love bower, where feasting, drinking, and music as well as boating provide conducive conditions for lovemaking. [Silver, 2006, 400:note 37; van der Heyden, 1570; Bening, ca. 1515; Orenstein, 2001, 236-238: no. 105-106; Wieck, 1988, 45-54]… Once more, it should be recalled that these are precisely the kinds of activities condemned elsewhere by Bosch as the sin of luxuria in his Prado table tabletop [Bosch, ca. 1505-1510] and in his wing panel of… an Allegory of Gluttony. Indeed, such activities mark gardens of love (sometimes with added ascetic figures to be discovered) in later Flemish and Dutch painting, from Pieter Pourbus, Allegory of True Love [Pourbus, c. 1547] to a nascent seventeenth-century genre of “merry companies,’ where well-dressed young aristocrats feast and flirt in outdoor garden settings [Silver, 2006, 400:note 38; Huvenne, 1979; Nevitt, 2003, 21-98; de Bruyn, 1604; de Bruyn, 1601; Hellerstedt, 1986, 42-44, no. 16; Renger, 1976, 190-203; Nichols, 1992, 32-42]. (pp. 52-53) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #814 Man on a barrel with five skinny men in the waters from An Allegory of Intemperance Certainly images of courtly love bowers figure prominently within calendar page illustrations, particularly for the lusty spring months of April and May. Half a century after Bosch, Pieter Bruegel’s drawing design for a print of Spring [Bruegel, 1565 (Der Frühling)] still features not only the preparation of a formal garden under a matron’s careful supervision in the foreground but also, at its vanishing point, a love bower, where feasting, drinking, and music as well as boating provide conducive conditions for lovemaking. [Silver, 2006, 400:note 37; van der Heyden, 1570; Bening, ca. 1515; Orenstein, 2001, 236-238: no. 105-106; Wieck, 1988, 45-54]… Once more, it should be recalled that these are precisely the kinds of activities condemned elsewhere by Bosch as the sin of luxuria in his Prado table tabletop [Bosch, ca. 1505-1510] and in his wing panel of… an Allegory of Gluttony. Indeed, such activities mark gardens of love (sometimes with added ascetic figures to be discovered) in later Flemish and Dutch painting, from Pieter Pourbus, Allegory of True Love [Pourbus, c. 1547] to a nascent seventeenth-century genre of “merry companies,’ where well-dressed young aristocrats feast and flirt in outdoor garden settings [Silver, 2006, 400:note 38; Huvenne, 1979; Nevitt, 2003, 21-98; de Bruyn, 1604; de Bruyn, 1601; Hellerstedt, 1986, 42-44, no. 16; Renger, 1976, 190-203; Nichols, 1992, 32-42]. (pp. 52-53) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #815 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools …the association of water with sinful self-indulgence in earlier Bosch imagery, particularly in the Ship of Fools… [van der Heyden, 1559; van der Heyden, 1562] (p. 68) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #816 Couple in a pink tent with clothes on shore from An Allegory of Intemperance …the association of water with sinful self-indulgence in earlier Bosch imagery, particularly in… Allegory of Gluttony… [van der Heyden, 1559; van der Heyden, 1562] (p. 68) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #817 Man on a barrel with five skinny men in the waters from An Allegory of Intemperance …the association of water with sinful self-indulgence in earlier Bosch imagery, particularly in the Ship of Fools and Allegory of Gluttony… [van der Heyden, 1559; van der Heyden, 1562] (p. 68) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #831 Boat with ten people onboard from Ship of Fools …the Paris-New Haven wing presents a consistent enactment of another deadly sin: luxuria, sensuous self-indulgence featuring lust and gluttony in combination. In some respects, this fleshly weakness can be seen as the same kind of product of prosperity that provoked the image of Death and the Usurer [Bosch, ca. 1485-1490]… Bosch exploring such lustful and gluttonous impulses in me central panel of his Garden of Earthly Delights [Bosch, ca. 1490-1500]… its giant fruits and sexually cavorting nudes display a more extreme form of the same behavior as Bosch represents in his Ship of Fools and Allegory of Gluttony wing. (p. 245) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #832 Man on a barrel with five skinny men in the waters from An Allegory of Intemperance …the Paris-New Haven wing presents a consistent enactment of another deadly sin: luxuria, sensuous self-indulgence featuring lust and gluttony in combination. In some respects, this fleshly weakness can be seen as the same kind of product of prosperity that provoked the image of Death and the Usurer [Bosch, ca. 1485-1490]… Bosch exploring such lustful and gluttonous impulses in me central panel of his Garden of Earthly Delights [Bosch, ca. 1490-1500]… its giant fruits and sexually cavorting nudes display a more extreme form of the same behavior as Bosch represents in his Ship of Fools and Allegory of Gluttony wing. (p. 245) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #833 Couple in a pink tent with clothes on shore from An Allegory of Intemperance …the Paris-New Haven wing presents a consistent enactment of another deadly sin: luxuria, sensuous self-indulgence featuring lust and gluttony in combination. In some respects, this fleshly weakness can be seen as the same kind of product of prosperity that provoked the image of Death and the Usurer [Bosch, ca. 1485-1490]… Bosch exploring such lustful and gluttonous impulses in me central panel of his Garden of Earthly Delights [Bosch, ca. 1490-1500]… its giant fruits and sexually cavorting nudes display a more extreme form of the same behavior as Bosch represents in his Ship of Fools and Allegory of Gluttony wing. (p. 245) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #837 Man on a barrel with five skinny men in the waters from An Allegory of Intemperance At the left edge a fat figure, like the personification of the fleshly holiday, Carnival, rides upon a great, floating barrel presumably containing intoxicating wine or beer. He is dressed like a peasant but also wears a pink cowl like a monk. His absurd funnel hat echoes me quack physician of Bosch’s Extracton of the Stone of Folly [Bosch, ca. 1501-1505] as well as me headgear of me devilish messenger in the left wing of the St. Anthony triptych[Bosch, ca. 1500 (Temptations of St. Anthony)], and has been explained as a symbol of incontinence and merrymaking, like Carnival itself [Bax, 1979, 181-182]. Around the barrel float figures, several of them nude, in search of drink; one of them stretches out a drinking-bowl to catch a stream of alcohol. Below him swims anomer figure with a plate of meat pie upon his head, obscuring his face. (p. 245) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #855 Pennant with cresent symbol from Ship of Fools No one could view the Bosch panels without realizing that this indulgence is sinful. But the Louvre panel contains explicit labels that mark the scene as evil. For one thing, the banner fluttering from the tree-mast bears the crescent moon of Islam, no longer associated with turbaned figures in exotic dress but now atop a boat with Christian monastics in the midst of their pleasures. (p. 252) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #858 Ragged poor man from The Pedlar The more specific identity of this figure as a peddler can be determined by observing that he carries a rncksack for his goods [Renger, 1969; de Bruyn, 2001 (Hieronymous Bosch’s So-Called Prodigal Son Tondo); de Bruyn, 2001]. His poverty is obvious from his scruffy costume with holes in the knee and from his bandaged leg with unmatched footwear. But he does have a small coin purse with a knife at his waist. He passes by a country inn that obviously doubles as a brothel, as the caged bird under the cave makes explicit… Earlier scholars attempted to interpret the main figure as the Prodigal Son of the gospel parable [English Standard Version Bible, 2001, Luke, 15:11-32], who is reduced to repentant poverty by wine, women, and song in taverns, and forced to dwell among swine. But this figure is grey-haired rather than youthful, and there is no reason in the parable for him to carry a peddler’s pack, either before he squanders his patrimony or afterwards. (p. 254) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #860 Backpack from The Pedlar That pack certainly explains why Bosch’s figure is an itinerant, wandering the countryside. Because of his specific occupation, the Rotterdam vagrant cannot be fully allegorized as a true everyman, Augustine’s man-the-pilgrim moving through this world, as some scholars have argued [Chew, 1962; Tuve, 1966, 145-218]. Of course this allegory underlies the Puritan John Bunyan’s famous Pilgrim’s Progress [Bunyan, 1678], a consideration of the World, the Flesh, and the Devil. But peddlers in the sixteenth century were frequently associated with tavern life, that is, with gambling, drinking, and deceit. Such a figure actually appears with his pack behind the name figure in the Prodigal Son by Jan van Hemessen [van Hemessen, 1536]; he holds dice, and his clothing contrasts with the extravagant fasluons of the Prodigal Son himself (the denouement of the parable with both the swine and the return to the father appears in miniature in the background) [Renger, 1970, 27]. (p. 254) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #861 Ragged poor man from The Pedlar That pack certainly explains why Bosch’s figure is an itinerant, wandering the countryside. Because of his specific occupation, the Rotterdam vagrant cannot be fully allegorized as a true everyman, Augustine’s man-the-pilgrim moving through this world, as some scholars have argued [Chew, 1962; Tuve, 1966, 145-218]. Of course this allegory underlies the Puritan John Bunyan’s famous Pilgrim’s Progress [Bunyan, 1678], a consideration of the World, the Flesh, and the Devil. But peddlers in the sixteenth century were frequently associated with tavern life, that is, with gambling, drinking, and deceit. Such a figure actually appears with his pack behind the name figure in the Prodigal Son by Jan van Hemessen [van Hemessen, 1536]; he holds dice, and his clothing contrasts with the extravagant fasluons of the Prodigal Son himself (the denouement of the parable with both the swine and the return to the father appears in miniature in the background) [Renger, 1970, 27]. (p. 254) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #868 Ladle on backpack from The Pedlar The presence on his pack of a prominent large spoon (or ladle) of self-indulgence as well as a cat skin ensures that this peddler is neither without desires nor an innocent [Silver, 2006, 410-411:note 30; Bax, 1979, 216-217; Zupnick, 1968, 115-132; Renger, 1970, 129-142; Bruegel, 1568 (Les Mendiants ou Les Culs-de-jatte); Tóth-Ubbens, 1987, 73-76]. (p. 256-257) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch #869 Catskin on backpack from The Pedlar The presence on his pack of a prominent large spoon (or ladle) of self-indulgence as well as a cat skin ensures that this peddler is neither without desires nor an innocent [Silver, 2006, 410-411:note 30; Bax, 1979, 216-217; Zupnick, 1968, 115-132; Renger, 1970, 129-142; Bruegel, 1568 (Les Mendiants ou Les Culs-de-jatte); Tóth-Ubbens, 1987, 73-76]. For example, a cat stealing a squab from a plate appears prominently within the painting of a brothel by Jan van Hemessen [van Hemessen, 1543], in which another older traveler, still wearing his hat, is being accosted, despite his feeble resistance, by a group of young harlots as well as an old bawd; meanwhile a dog crouches beneath the table. The cat, then, should be construed as an image of these loose women, and wearing a cat skin could show (like the bandage on his leg) that the peddler has a past in the taverns as a “skirt chaser” or “cat hunter” (katsjager). Hemessen’s image… offers the equivalent of an interior view of the tavern-brothel of Bosch’s background, complete with drink and women plus tavern cats and dogs.(p. 256-257) Silver, 2006 Hieronymus Bosch